On Sun, 21 Apr 2019 at 07:38, Martin Husemann <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 20, 2019 at 08:31:29PM +0000, [email protected] wrote: > > I understand it's meant to aim for 80x25, which is what we used to have. > > There were some complaint threads about how much smaller DRM/KMS made > > things, but perhaps people got used to it. > > It is way too big on my old 14" pinebook too, we need a better selection > algorithm (or maybe there is a bug, I'll check resulting rows/columns > with the default font next week).
Slight tangent - would it be reasonable to include the determined cols x rows after the initial font load in the dmesg? David
