Martin Husemann writes: > On Thu, Jun 06, 2019 at 07:18:57PM +0000, m...@netbsd.org wrote: > > Most likely, you had: > > libc.so.12.207, libc.so.12.208 > > >From unpacking older sets, you gained a symlink to an older minor: > > libc.so.12 -> libc.so.12.207 > > Postinstall apparently sees, "old minors! I can get rid of it!" > > > > It should probably check that it's not in use. > > In all "valid" installations, the symlink should point to the newest > version, so removing the older ones is ok. However, it could check > explicitly for this situation. > > The more interesting question though is: how did you get into that mess > in the first place?
installing -current and the installing release will do this. can someone please fix postinstall for this? it's dangerous and i've been bitten by the libc.so removal myself :-( .mrg.
