Some time back I asked about what provided device-specific "vdpau" support after seeing a message from 'mplayer' about not finding "libvdpau_i965.so" when detecting the video capabilities of my intel-graphics-equipped system.
I was informed that "vdpau" support was part of Mesa. With the import of the shiny new Mesa (and accompanying LLVM build overhead), I had been expecting to see such device-specific goodies become a part of the xorg sets in -current. It appears this is not the case. I tend to worry when I see messages about missing libraries, even if there is a fallback to do without them. Is there some performance benefit being missed, or some other capability that can't be leveraged due to the missing library? Or does it tend to be too small to be worth the effort of including the device-specific support? Thanks. -- |/"\ John D. Baker, KN5UKS NetBSD Darwin/MacOS X |\ / jdbaker[snail]consolidated[flyspeck]net OpenBSD FreeBSD | X No HTML/proprietary data in email. BSD just sits there and works! |/ \ GPGkeyID: D703 4A7E 479F 63F8 D3F4 BD99 9572 8F23 E4AD 1645