"John D. Baker" <[email protected]> wrote: >On Fri, 2 Aug 2019, Robert Swindells wrote: > >> > /var/chroot/spamd >> > >> If you have local changes to your source tree then the files under >> src/distrib/sets/lists need to match that. >> >> If the two files that are being removed are from outside your NetBSD >> source tree then it might be worth renaming them so that they don't >> match actual obsolete files. > >I only ever install "mail/spamd" from pkgsrc. I have no local changes >to my source trees regarding "spamd". I didn't know it was ever created >as part of the system build at some time in the past.
It was removed in 2005, according to the logs. I would argue that this is a pkgsrc issue, mail/spamd should use different pathnames from the older version that was in base. >The "fontconfig"-related files/links ARE part of the base system build. >Since base (xbase?) fontconfig is considered new enough to be used by >packages in recent pkgsrc branches, I need to set the symbolic link for >"../conf.avail/70-no-bitmaps.conf" in "/etc/fonts/conf.d" in order to >print legible hardcopy of some web pages. You are probably using pkgsrc fontconfig but that doesn't make a difference here. >At some time during the 8.99.* period, this link began to be declared >obsolete and removed if "fix"ed. Not too long ago, it started tripping >up the "fontconfig" check, ISTR it threw up an "unknown file" complaint. > >(On netbsd-8, the 'postinstall' checks ignore the extra symlink. However >on netbsd-8, pkgsrc fontconfig is used and I can set its symbolic link >for "../conf.avail/70-no-bitmaps.conf" appropriately without issue--even >when updating pkgsrc fontconfig.) I think the answer to this part is to remove the whole entry in xetc/mi for 70-no-bitmaps.conf, it was only made part of the build for one day.
