On Tue, 17 Sep 2019 at 18:18, David Brownlee <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, 17 Sep 2019 at 17:02, David Brownlee <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Mon, 16 Sep 2019 at 18:38, matthew green <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > I've been playing with NetBSD 9.0_BETA amd64 from nyftp on a laptop for > > > > a > > > > little while and noticed a significant drop in stability sometime after > > > > Aug > > > > 18 (I have an Aug 18 kernel which seems solid, but Sep 2, 7 and 10 also > > > > panic) > > > > > > i am hoping this problem is already fixed in -current and on > > > netbsd-9 with this pullup: > > > > > > http://mail-index.netbsd.org/source-changes/2019/09/13/msg108959.html > > > > > > can you at least see if the ure issue is resolved now? > > > > The 20190915 nyftp build identifies as "NetBSD 9.0_BETA (GENERIC) #0: > > Fri Sep 13 07:02:22 UTC 2019", so > > I'm not certain if its picked that change up - I notice there is now a > > 201909170430Z build so I'll download and > > switch to that this evening -- thanks. > > The kernel in 201909170430Z is the same, but it has usbnet.c,v > 1.25.2.3 which matches that pullup, so should be good. I should just > have checked 'ident /netbsd' to start with...I'm away from my ure at > the moment, but that lets me give it a good test without before > connecting.
Looks like the system is stable both with and without ure with those latest changes - many thanks. (netbsd-8 firefox binary on netbsd-9 is still unhappy in a different way, but thats just firefox :) David
