On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 08:11:46PM +0100, Frank Kardel wrote: > interrupt total rate type > vmcmd kills 17984 0 misc > vmcmd extends 17980 0 misc > vmcmd calls 185033 0 misc > pserialize exclusive access 145 0 misc > vmem static_bt_inuse 200 0 misc > vmem static_bt_count 200 0 misc > rndpseudo open soft 39 0 misc > TLB shootdown 50603277 139 intr > softint net/0 33488890 92 misc > softint bio/0 1 0 misc > softint clk/0 4239404 11 misc > softint ser/0 2656 0 misc > callout late/0 199 0 misc > crosscall unicast 60 0 misc > namecache entries collected 940528 2 misc > namecache under scan target 362220 0 misc > vcpu0 xenev0 channel 4 18112410 50 intr > softint net/1 564465 1 misc > softint bio/1 1 0 misc > ... > > softint clk/11 385635 1 misc > softint ser/11 149 0 misc > callout late/11 1 0 misc > vcpu0 xenev0 channel 2 297 0 intr > vcpu0 raw systime went backwards 158 0 intr > vcpu0 xenev0 channel 5 36222558 99 intr > vcpu1 xenev0 channel 6 155497 0 intr > vcpu1 missed hardclock 83 0 intr > vcpu1 xenev0 channel 7 36222475 99 intr > vcpu2 xenev0 channel 8 15438790 42 intr > ... > > xbd0 map unaligned 96051 0 misc > xbd1 map unaligned 1406926 3 misc > > TLB shootdown is there as some crosscall unicast. I don't see any other IPIs > though.
Indeed it seems that in netbsd9 IPIs don't show up as such. But there should be some crosscall broadcast. On a netbsd-9 pbulk host I see more broadcast than unicast. -- Manuel Bouyer <[email protected]> NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference --
