On Sun, 10 May 2020, Michael van Elst wrote:
p...@whooppee.com (Paul Goyette) writes:
Well, 90%+ of the effort has already been expended, so why not?
90%+ is probably the time needed to test optional builds in the future.
FWIW, I have just successfully completed my build of my custom kernel
(and an entire ``build.sh release'') and it correctly included the
rijndael stuff (even without the two {,sw}crypto pseudo-devices).
And I'd like to talk to Martin, since 100% of the task is done if
we just add the missing dependency without the option. Even an
#ifdef SMALL could be easier to maintain.
Yep, that would work, too. I'm open to either approach, just would
like to move forward.
+--------------------+--------------------------+-----------------------+
| Paul Goyette | PGP Key fingerprint: | E-mail addresses: |
| (Retired) | FA29 0E3B 35AF E8AE 6651 | p...@whooppee.com |
| Software Developer | 0786 F758 55DE 53BA 7731 | pgoye...@netbsd.org |
+--------------------+--------------------------+-----------------------+