I would be very happy if a decision would be taken in a timely manner. I prefer git over mercurial, but any of them is better than cvs.
> Am 14.05.2020 um 17:27 schrieb Martin Husemann <mar...@duskware.de>: > > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 09:16:31PM -0700, Greg A. Woods wrote: >> I.e. the final repo DAG should contain all submitted commits, and all >> that history should be visible to those who look for it (just as is the >> case with merges from github "pull requests"). > > This is the case in our setup. In the "draft" phase you can revert, > rewrite, collapse and change a few things, but in the end you have > a line of changesets that on final push are made visible on the tip > of the trunk (still as individual changes). > > Martin
