On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 10:33:31AM +0900, Ryota Ozaki wrote: > > Thank you for the report! > > Just curious. Does it improve performance? (or reduce CPU/memory usage?)
The Coyote Point loadbalancers couldn't survive our load testing (which was modeled on traces of real world workloads) without it. But Coyote Point was bought by Fortinet and I believe the NetBSD-based firmware is long gone. Coyote Point did much more with the fat pointer stuff, but I don't think any of it even got into the internal tree before they were purchased and basically shut down. A lot of it was actually aimed at connection placement to improve concurrency within the stack - it is not surprising that if you are looking at only a small fragment of it, it makes that much _harder_. Thor