On 01/19/2015 08:24 PM, Michael Hamburg wrote:
On their “comparison” slide did they mention that the Ed448-Goldilocks and
E-521 impls both use point compression, and therefore have a 10% penalty vs
their Ted37919 numbers? It seems a little dishonest if they didn’t.
I shouldn't have written this. I do think it's important to mention
that the benchmarks are for different operations, and I do think that
the slide's numbers favor Ted37919. But the difference is closer than
I'd initially thought and anyway it's assuming too much to describe this
as dishonesty.
Sorry,
-- Mike
_______________________________________________
Curves mailing list
[email protected]
https://moderncrypto.org/mailman/listinfo/curves
