If the goal is around Cloud CVES then it’s a really good idea for us (CVE Board
members and CVE Program Secretariate) to be there. I think there is a weird
misunderstanding around cloud vulns and scope of CNAs. I think, at least in my
conversations with Cloud vendors, that there is a fundamental communication
barrier but that we are actually a lot more compatible then THEY often think.
-----Original Message-----
From: Landfield, Kent (Enterprise) <kent_landfi...@mcafee.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2022 10:41 AM
To: Art Manion <aman...@cert.org>; Noble, Kathleen <kathleen.no...@intel.com>;
CVE Editorial Board Discussion <cve-editorial-board-list@mitre.org>
Subject: Re: CNCF proposed Global Security Vulnerability Summit #835
Sounds good. Thanka!
Thank you, Gracias, Grazie, Mahalo, 谢谢, Merci!, Σας ευχαριστώ!, Спасибо!,
Bedankt,Danke!, ありがとう, धन्यवाद!
--
Kent Landfield
McAfee Enterprise
+1.817.637.8026
kent_landfi...@mcafee.com
On 1/11/22, 9:35 AM, "Art Manion" <aman...@cert.org> wrote:
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you
recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
No dates yet, IIUC this is a discussion/proposal, not yet a decision to
hold the event.
It looks like (and from a side convesation) that one of the goals is more
CVE IDs for cloud vulnerabilities, which aligns with the CVE mission.
- Art
On 2022-01-11 10:27, Landfield, Kent (Enterprise) wrote:
> I too would attend. I am wondering what is the real outcome of this event
they are trying to achieve.
>
> Thank you, Gracias, Grazie, Mahalo, 谢谢, Merci!, Σας ευχαριστώ!, Спасибо!,
Bedankt,Danke!, ありがとう, धन्यवाद!
