On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 10:13:50 -0600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark Linimon) wrote: > On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 01:36:54PM +0200, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > > Can we be _consistent_ in respect of the *_DATABASE* variables ? E.g. > > BROKEN_WITH_DATABASE (it should be a enumeration and work for > > all databases) > > Please, if we do this, let's fix the bug that BROKEN is set instead > of IGNORE in these cases.
So you want to call it IGNORE_WITH_DATABASE or just set INGNORE instead of BROKEN ? -- IOnut - Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect" BOFH excuse #418: Sysadmins busy fighting SPAM _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
