On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 08:23:06PM +0800, Ariff Abdullah wrote: > On Tue, 15 Nov 2005 09:58:52 +0000 (GMT) > Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Tue, 15 Nov 2005, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > > > >> Modified files: > > >> sys/dev/sound/pcm channel.c > > >> Log: > > >> Unbreak kernel builds. > > >> > > >> Submitted by: arr > > > > > > Hos does the change from "min & (min-1) == 0" to "(min & (min-1)) > > > == 0" fix the building of a kernel (what was the error message > > > from gcc)? > > > > Probably a combination of -Wall and -Werror, which generally > > generates a warning along the following lines: > > > > warning: suggest parentheses around comparison in operand of & > > > That means, warnings caused by excessive inlining while compiling > maestro.c should also break the build if WARNS=1, right? Has anybody > encounter and getting annoyed by this?
No, function inlining doesn't change the semantics of expressions. Stefan _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
