On Sat, 2005-12-24 at 16:19 -0500, Adam Weinberger wrote:
> >> (12.24.2005 @ 1605 PST): Joe Marcus Clarke said, in 1.5K: <<
> > On Sat, 2005-12-24 at 16:01 -0500, Adam Weinberger wrote:
> > > >> (12.24.2005 @ 1204 PST): Joe Marcus Clarke said, in 1.0K: <<
> > > > On Sat, 2005-12-24 at 16:55 +0000, Adam Weinberger wrote:
> > > > > adamw 2005-12-24 16:55:31 UTC
> > > > >
> > > > > FreeBSD ports repository
> > > > >
> > > > > Modified files:
> > > > > devel/libsoup Makefile
> > > > > Log:
> > > > > Add PTHREAD_CFLAGS/LIBS to CONFIGURE_ENV, and make LDFLAGS actually
> > > > > be a part of CONFIGURE_ENV.
> > > >
> > > > You have to treat LDFLAGS specially because of OpenSSL. Also, we really
> > > > need Ade to look into this libtool problem. We shouldn't have to hack
> > > > all of these ports when it seems pretty clear the new libtool is at
> > > > fault here.
> > > >> end of "Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/libsoup Makefile" from Joe Marcus
> > > >> Clarke <<
> > >
> > > w0rd. I've backed it out and put LDFLAGS back where it belongs. Should
> > > it be passed to CONFIGURE_ENV though?
> >
> > No. bsd.openssl.mk takes care of that for us.
> >
> > Joe
> >> end of "Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/libsoup Makefile" from Joe Marcus
> >> Clarke <<
>
> Hrmmn. I'm pretty sure that when I added ${PTHREAD_LIBS} to that
> LDFLAGS line, it didn't get passed to configure. At least, the
> build still failed anyway.Ah, nevermind. I see we've yanked out OpenSSL in favor of GnuTLS. Therefore, we will have to revert to handling LDFLAGS ourselves. Sorry for the confusion. Joe -- PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
