Hi, Doug Rabson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
df> dfr 2005-12-29 14:40:22 UTC df> df> FreeBSD src repository df> df> Modified files: df> . Makefile.inc1 df> crypto/openssh sshd.c df> etc Makefile df> etc/mtree BSD.include.dist BSD.root.dist df> gnu/usr.bin/cvs/cvs Makefile df> include Makefile df> kerberos5/lib/libgssapi Makefile (snip) df> Log: df> Add a new extensible GSS-API layer which can support GSS-API plugins, df> similar the the Solaris implementation. Repackage the krb5 GSS mechanism df> as a plugin library for the new implementation. This also includes a df> comprehensive set of manpages for the GSS-API functions with text mostly df> taken from the RFC. Are these RFC derived manual pages legally safe? Recently we replaced our IPv6 related manual pages from KAME project because most of them reuse RFC text as manual pages and IETF rights in contribution (RFC 3978) does not permit to produce a derivative work except for IETF or ISOC. So, I think we have a consensus that the RFC license is incompatible with the BSD license. -- | Hiroki SATO
pgpW2fSxOMdBz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
