On Thu, 07 Feb 2008 17:01:36 -0600, Mikhail Teterin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

четвер 07 лютий 2008 05:42 по, Pav Lucistnik Ви написали:
> Why can't the package-building infrastructure put the
> two-and-two together and figure out, that the dependent ports need
> rebuilding /without/ explicit PORTREVISION bump?

Where are the patches?

Pav, this is insincere. As a portmgr member you know, that I have, in fact,
contributed patches. Some of them are even in the bsd.port.mk. With that
aside, let's continue...

The package-building is in capable hands, I'm sure -- actual patches
(implementation) is not the problem. I'm pointing at a /design/ flaw.
Pointing it out should be sufficient.

What about the users that who are using ports, not packages? The PORTREVISION is need or/and add info in /usr/ports/UPDATING about reinstall these ports that depend on icu.

Cheers,
Mezz

Best,

 -mi


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD GNOME Team  -  FreeBSD Multimedia Hat (ports, not src)
http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wiki.freebsd.org/multimedia  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to