2008/2/10, Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Sun, 10 Feb 2008, Attilio Rao wrote: > > >> > I think this shall be MFCed to RELENG_7 and RELENG_7_0. > >> > >> ... once it no longer breaks the tinderbox? > >> > >> BTW, at this point 7.0 is basically closed to any further changes. Anyone > >> planning on getting things in to 7.x needs to be thinking about either > >> errata notices (for really critical things) and 7.1. > > > > Buh! I'm very sorry for this. Really, this needed to be better croaked. It > > needs to include sys/lock.h for any lockmgr.h consumer (making lock.h a > > pre-requirement in lockmgr usage). This is going to be a little bit of > work. > > > > For the moment I will revert this change, doing a better stub later, once > > other details about lockmgr are refined. > > > Or temporarily nested include lock.h from lockmgr.h. I'm pretty sure that all > consumers of struct lock pretty much include _lock.h, so if there's a > widespread dependency you could also move whatever the definitions are to > _lock.h.
As long as this is also temporary code, I would prefer to move lock.h into lockmgr.h as solution. I don't want to touch _lock.h as traditionally (about all the other locking primitives too) this only includes structures definition and related macros (which has nothing to do with this specific problem). Attilio -- Peace can only be achieved by understanding - A. Einstein _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
