John Baldwin wrote:
I'm not sure that's quite fair. :) What happened is that his original patch
did work fine (and has been in HEAD for a while), but it changed the API, so
he did a quick fixup to restore the API in RELENG_6 and missed one file
during that subsequent update.
I should have been more clear. I wasn't asking if the change had been
tested, I followed the thread where it was discussed for HEAD. What I should
have asked is, "Did you test the change in RELENG_6 by at minimum building
world and kernel before you committed?" Doing so would have caught the
missed file, and avoided breakage in a -stable branch.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"