On Mon, 10 Mar 2008, John Baldwin wrote:

So are we creating packages for ports that are compressed with gzip but using bzip names? Otherwise, gunzip should probably fail on a '.tbz' because it isn't a gzipped file (unless gunzip auto-invokes bunzip2 or some such feature that I'm not aware of).

gunzip is smarter than you think. :-)

Hmm. I guess I would consider it a user error to use gunzip on a bzip'd file (round peg, square hole sort of deal). However, that has more to do with the functionality (which I find surprising and perhaps a bit non-UNIX-ish) rather than this specific patch.

Yeah -- this change was really just about teaching gunzip that unzipping a .tbz or .tbz2 file is like unzipping a .tgz or .tgz2 file as was the case for .tgz: rename it to .tar when it's unzipped. The functionality to unzip bz2 files was already present, you just end up with a different file extension when done. I can see arguments for and against that, but nothing to do with the patch I committed. :-)

Robert N M Watson
Computer Laboratory
University of Cambridge
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to