Andrew Gallatin wrote:
John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MI code can currently (ab)use this by doing:
intr_bind(rman_get_start(irq_res), cpu);
however, I plan to add a truly MI interface (probably a bus_bind_intr(9))
Thank you very much for this!
Do you plan to add a generic adminstrative interface to bind
interrupts, or may I add a driver specific sysctl to bind mxge's
interrupts in mxge? If you plan to add a generic administrative
interface, I think we also need to add a way for drivers to label
their interrupts so that an administrator can differentiate between
the different MSI-X vectors.
Any idea where this should go? Might be time to grow a tool that grok's
the newbus hierarchy and pushes requests to devices. I've wanted
functionality like netbsd has recently added to control power to devices
and this would be seem to be similar. Not sure if we can do something
that'd unify programs like atacontrol and camcontrol (or whether this is
a good idea).
Sam
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"