In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: On Wednesday 23 April 2008 09:26:14 pm Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
: >
: > On Apr 23, 2008, at 5:40 PM, Peter Wemm wrote:
: >
: > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 5:58 AM, John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: > >> On Saturday 19 April 2008 03:25:57 am Peter Wemm wrote:
: > >>> peter 2008-04-19 07:25:57 UTC
: > >>>
: > >>> FreeBSD src repository
: > >>>
: > >>> Modified files:
: > >>> sys/amd64/amd64 machdep.c
: > >>> Log:
: > >>> Put in a real isa_irq_pending() stub in order to remove two lines
: > >>> of
: > >>> dmesg noise from sio per unit. sio likes to probe if interrupts are
: > >>> configured correctly by looking at the pending bits of the atpic
: > >>> in order
: > >>> to put a non-fatal warning on the console. I think I'd rather
: > >>> read the
: > >>> pending bits from the apics, but I'm not sure its worth the hassle.
: > >>
: > >> Actually, the x86 interrupt sources have a pending method so this
: > >> can be
: > >> replaced. Could probably easily write something like this:
: > >>
: > >> int
: > >> intr_pending(u_int irq)
: > >> {
: > >> struct intsrc *isrc;
: > >>
: > >> isc = intr_lookup_source(irq);
: > >> if (isrc == NULL)
: > >> panic("bizarre");
: > >> return (isrc->is_pic->pic_pending(isrc));
: > >> }
: > >>
: > >> For intr_machdep.c and use this in sio:
: > >>
: > >> #if defined(__i386__) || defined(__amd64__)
: > >> foo = intr_pending(rman_get_start(irq_resource));
: > >> #else
: > >> foo = isa_irq_pending() & (1 << rman_get_start(irq_resource));
: > >> #endif
: > >>
: > >> or some such. I'd really prefer to kill isa_irq_pending().
: > >
: > > Let's just add intr_pending() to all MD backends that currently
: > > provide isa_irq_pending() for sio's benenfit. Either as a simple
: > > wrapper around the now-static local isa_irq_pending() (ia64), or by
: > > simplifying and converting isa_irq_pending() into intr_pending()
: > > (sparc64).
: >
: > sio() is only for i386 and amd64, isa_irq_pending() should be
: > removed from all MD code, except from i386 and amd64.
:
: Other people may still want to use sio, but the use of isa_irq_pending() in
: sio is dubious at best and really only applicable to ISA sio parts anyway.
: It's probably a waste of time to bother checking for PCI devices, etc.
It only checks for ISA and CBUS devices, the only places where it was
ever relevant.
Warner
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
