Ed Schouten wrote:
Alan,
* Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can you please draw a new layout, similar to the one made by Peter?
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-amd64/2005-July/005578.html
I'm not familiar with the design of amd64 or its page tables, but is
there some kind of overhead when all 512 GB's would be allocated as kva?
Yes, it would consume a rather large amount of (physical) memory.
Roughly speaking, we preallocate memory for the page table that
implements the kernel's address space. In other words, mapping a page
into the kernel's address space never requires the allocation of (page
table) memory, and unmapping a page never frees memory. This has some
benefits, e.g., we will never block while mapping physical memory into
the kernel's address space, and we can use a very simple, very fast
method for mapping part of a file into the buffer cache.
In general, that is, on most machine architectures, we can use a very
simple technique to avoid preallocating page table memory that can't
possibly be used. However, on amd64, the need to have kernel code and
global/static variables in the highest 2GB of the kernel's address space
undermines the effectiveness of that technique. So, it is still
impractical to make the amd64 kernel address space arbitrarily large, as
in 512GB.
Alan
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
