On Sat, 05 Jul 2008 15:02:40 -0500, Craig Rodrigues
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 03:54:53PM -0400, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
The patch in the PR actually used Tools/scripts/bump_version.pl to bump
all those ports, but it was for *some* reason not committed,
I chose to err on the side of caution, and submit separate PR's to the
different port maintainers, since I don't like to blindly commit to
ports which I know nothing about.
I hate it when people blindly commit to APR, so I don't want to do
the same thing to other ports.
While you submit many good ports patches, I don't really trust your
track record. If you had an actual ports commit bit, then you
would have more credibility with me to submit mega-patches which
affect many ports. If someone who knows you better can sponsor
you for a commit bit, then you can take on more of this responsibility
for yourself, instead of dumping mega-patches for committers to pick up
I think what you have done is worst. What Philip has done in PR is a good
job for being a non-committer and quality to be a one. You should read
"May 2008 monthly portmgr report" in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD GNOME Team
http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
