On Tue, 2008-07-08 at 12:11 +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > On Tue, 8 Jul 2008, Coleman Kane wrote: > > Hopefully people will begin to incorporate "svn blame" into their > > work-flows. > > A 2 line comment would be much simpler and more likely to actually work > IMO :) >
Yeah, commenting such things when non-obvious is always a good idea too, not trying to discount that one bit. Just wanted to suggest that more people try using svn blame/annotate, and this is a good example of why it exists. -- Coleman Kane
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
