Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 13:46:18 -0400
Joe Marcus Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, 2008-07-13 at 04:39 +0300, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 04:16:43 +0300
Ion-Mihai Tetcu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
building rhythmbox-0.11.6 in directory /var/tinderbox/7-STABLE-FTP
maintained by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
building for: 7.0-STABLE amd64
port directory: /usr/ports/audio/rhythmbox-devel
BTW, shouldn't it have PKGNAMEPREFIX= -devel ?
I think you mean SUFFIX, but in this case, the two ports are mutually
exclusive, so one could only have one rb installed. Therefore, I
chose to leave it off, and mark it NO_LATEST_LINK instead.
What's the benefit of this?
I guess it makes it a bit easier to convert the port to rhythmbox when
0.12.0 is released, but I never really considered it that closely.
There have been a few such examples (especially with GNOME ports) where
we've kept PKGNAME untouched to keep in sync with the actual dist names.
With PKGNAMESUFIX a pkg_info or ls /var/db/pkg tell you what port you
have installed.
I understand your point, but it's not that difficult to see this with
pkg_info -o.
Joe
--
Joe Marcus Clarke
FreeBSD GNOME Team :: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeNode / #freebsd-gnome
http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
