On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 11:39:51PM +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote: > Hi Bernd, > > Again, sorry for the late reply, I'm abroad this week once again for > work, so I have very little time for my personal stuff. > > On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 01:40:59PM +0200, Bernd Walter wrote: > > No change - with SSP all dynamic linked binaries fail the same as the > > 7-stable did. > > Without SSP only some binaries fail, but those are the same. > > And of course since my 7-stable binaries were failing as well this > > sounds like a kernel thing and not a userland one. > > > > What comes to mind after reading the original commit when reading the > > compiler options used: > > cc -mlittle-endian -c -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -mcpu=arm9 -std=c99 > > -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes > > -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -Wundef > > -Wno-pointer-sign -fformat-extensions -nostdinc -I. -I../../.. > > -I../../../contrib/altq -D_KERNEL -DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS -include > > opt_global.h -fno-common -finline-limit=8000 --param inline-unit-growth=100 > > --param large-function-growth=1000 -mcpu=arm9 -ffreestanding > > -fstack-protector -Werror ../../../arm/at91/at91_twi.c > > The original message says that -fstack-protector shouldn't be used for > > the kernel. > > So why it is there? > > I never explicitly enabled it anywhere. > > Actually, there was one patch to enable SSP for userland and another one > for kernel, but they have been committed together and their commitlog > has been concatenated. If you read it further, you will see the > kernel part commitlog.
Yes - I saw later that those were different compiler options. > Concerning the automatic activation, this is intended so as to give SSP > more exposure. We'll need to reach a consensus for the release about > whether it should be opt-in or opt-out. For now, you can disable it for > both userland and kernel using the WITHOUT_SPP knob in src.conf(5). If > you only want to disable it for kernel build, simply use "make > -DWITHOUT_SSP buildkernel". > > I'm keen to hear about any clue you will gather about the problem. Well Olivier Houchard went in and disabled SSP support on arm. He mentioned in his commit log a compiler bug, but you should ask him about the details. Unfortunately he missed one file, but after disabling this as well and recompiling the kernel, my problems were gone. -- B.Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.bwct.de Modbus/TCP Ethernet I/O Baugruppen, ARM basierte FreeBSD Rechner uvm. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
