Kris Kennaway píše v pá 27. 01. 2006 v 16:51 -0500: > On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 10:49:03PM +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > > Kris Kennaway p??e v p? 27. 01. 2006 v 16:13 -0500: > > > On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 07:41:01PM +0000, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > > > > > > | @@ -17,6 +17,9 @@ > > > > | # Keep this list sorted in the chronological order. New entries must > > > > | # be added at the tail. > > > > | # > > > > | +# If previously removed port gets restored, make sure to delete the > > > > relevant > > > > | +# line. > > > > > > It's more than that, though. If an old port is copied to a new > > > location and the old location is kept (e.g. upgraded to a later > > > version), don't record it here. > > > > Yes, I noticed few records like this, but I failed to come up with a > > concise sentence to note this. I blame my lack of English-fu. > > Would you mind suggesting a good wording for that? > > My second sentence above? :)
Right.
--
Pav Lucistnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
94 outdated ports on the box,
94 outdated ports.
Portupgrade one, an hour 'til done,
82 outdated ports on the box.
signature.asc
Description: Toto je digitálně podepsaná část zprávy
