On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 14:54:57 +0000
Xin LI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 28, 2006 at 01:05:06PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> >
> > Since we don't enable the use of HT per default for security reasons
> > (or did this change without me noticing this?), we don't need to detect
> > HT in this case.
>
> Because that the disable is implemented in a way that run idle cycle
> on the logical CPU I think we do need to detect it...
Replace "second" in the following with an appropriate number...
Not in this case, I think. If we have a UP kernel, the second hardware
tread isn't used. And if there's no second CPU core, there's no need to
use a SMP kernel at all. Since the loader only has to load the SMP
kernel when there's a second core, but not if there's a second hardware
thread, we just need those bits in the loader which detect the second
core (mptable) and not the HT detection bits.
Detecting and disabling HT when booting a SMP kernel can then happen as
usual.
Bye,
Alexander.
--
Loose bits sink chips.
http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net
GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91 3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7
WL http://www.amazon.de/exec/obidos/registry/1FZ4DTHQE9PQ8/ref=wl_em_to/
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
