Adam Weinberger escribió:
(03.26.2009 @ 1859 PST): Pav Lucistnik said, in 0.9K: <<
Garance A Drosihn pí?e v ?t 26. 03. 2009 v 14:40 -0400:
Well, still, why rebuild *anything* because pkg-desc changed?
It's about the question - do you care what's on ftp mirrors?
If you don't care, you don't raise PORTREVISION.
end of "Re: cvs commit: ports/shells/bash Makefile pkg-plist" from Pav Lucistnik
<<
Just saying, why not have a line in the commit message that triggers a
rebuild without bumping the PORTREVISION.
Package rebuild: yes
Or why not rebuilding them based on the md5 of the port's files then? I
don't think it would be a big overhead. Only a small percent of ports
commits don't change PORTVERSION/PORTREVISION.
--
Gabor Kovesdan
FreeBSD Volunteer
EMAIL: [email protected] .:|:. [email protected]
WEB: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~gabor .:|:. http://kovesdan.org
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
