On Mon, 13 Apr 2009 10:04:29 -0400 Wesley Shields <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 04:43:06PM +0300, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > > On Mon, 13 Apr 2009 08:42:52 -0400 > > Wesley Shields <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 04:08:42AM -0700, [email protected] wrote: > > > > The Restless Daemon identified a PLIST error while trying to > > > > build: q-7.11 maintained by [email protected] > > > > Makefile ident: $FreeBSD: ports/lang/q/Makefile,v 1.35 > > > > 2009/04/13 09:53:27 gahr Exp $ > > > > > > > > Excerpt from > > > > http://QAT.TecNik93.com/logs/7-STABLE-FPT-NPD/q-7.11.log : > > > > > > [...] > > > > > > This looks like a false positive to me. > > > > It wasn't. There was a second commit that fixed the problem probably > > while the port was building. > > Ah, and by the time I got to see the log it was fixed. Thanks. Yup. > > > On a related note, how does QAT handle MAKE_JOBS_SAFE? Does it > > > manage to find the error which could have been much earlier in > > > the log? > > > > QAT has 4 CPUs so it builds with multiple make jobs if the ports > > says so. There's no supplementary analyses being done, if the build > > doesn't exit when one of the jobs fails (as it should), the error > > would be catch at install or packaging time. > > But then the log excerpt in the email may not actually contain the > error. The excerpt is just a tail on the last lines of the log; usually it catches the error; I could try to do a little heuristics, but I'm not that sure of the results (I'd use the markup patters used by webui). Anyway, the log snippet is intended to hint the problem and any responsible commit implies reviewing the hole log. -- IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect" FreeBSD committer -> [email protected], PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
