On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 07:44:51 -0300 Marcelo Araujo <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 07:37:53AM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 02:28:41PM +0000, Marcelo Araujo wrote: > > > araujo 2009-06-30 14:28:41 UTC > > > > > > FreeBSD ports repository > > > > > > Modified files: > > > archivers/lzip Makefile distinfo > > > Log: > > > - Update to 1.7. > > > > > > PR: based on ports/136003 > > > Submitted by: Sylvio Cesar <[email protected]> (maintainer) > > > Approved by: maintainer > > > > Why would maintainer need to explicitly approve their changes? > > Hi danfe, > > It is very easy to answer, because he knows better than me if the new > version is usable or not. The maintainer submitted an update to 1.6, and as > we have a new release, I feel that was better ask the maintainer about that. > > Generally the maintainer knows better than us what is good or not for your > ports. Of course everybody knows that. > When the maintainer submits an update to one of his ports then he rather obviously has also automatically approved the changes. I think that is what danfe was getting at. --- Gary Jennejohn _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
