In message <[email protected]>,
Mark Linimon ([email protected]) wrote:
> linimon 2009-07-04 08:16:26 UTC
>
> FreeBSD doc repository
>
> Modified files:
> en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/portbuild article.sgml
> Log:
> Mention that we run the cluster on UTC.
>
> Reminded by: droso
>
> Revision Changes Path
> 1.40 +6 -0 doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/portbuild/article.sgml
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/portbuild/article.sgml.diff?r1=1.39&r2=1.40
> --- doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/portbuild/article.sgml 2009/06/14 06:02:09
> 1.39
> +++ doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/portbuild/article.sgml 2009/07/04 08:16:26
> 1.40
> @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
> <corpauthor>The &os; Ports Management Team</corpauthor>
> </authorgroup>
>
> - <pubdate>$FreeBSD:
> /usr/local/www/cvsroot/FreeBSD/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/portbuild/article.sgml,v
> 1.39 2009/06/14 06:02:09 linimon Exp $</pubdate>
> + <pubdate>$FreeBSD:
> /usr/local/www/cvsroot/FreeBSD/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/portbuild/article.sgml,v
> 1.40 2009/07/04 08:16:26 linimon Exp $</pubdate>
>
> <copyright>
> <year>2003</year>
> @@ -1399,6 +1399,12 @@ ganglia:*:102:102::0:0:User &:/usr/local
> </listitem>
>
> <listitem>
> + <para>We run the cluster on UTC:
> + <screen>cp ../../../usr/share/zoneinfo/Etc/UCT
> localtime</screen>
^^^
Curiosity has got the better of me. :-) Is there a reason why you have
used UCT rather than UTC, which seems more logical?
Cheers,
Nick.
--
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
