On Mon, 13 Jul 2009, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: >> - Update to checkpoint release 1.2.0_20090223 > This change is wrong; PORTREVISION should not be used to encode any > software version part; its sole purpose for ports infrastructure only. > For complex vendor versions, DISTVERSION should be used instead. Right > now, for instance, you've essentially made impossible to bump PORTREVISION, > shall it be required for any reason, without introducing ugly hacks.
This sounds very familiar to the status quo I maintained with the lang/gcc ports for some years which I then resolved a few months ago. Philip, you may want to have a look at lang/gcc43 for an example how I addressed this there -- and if you find improvements, let me know. ;-) Gerald _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
