On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 12:35 -0500, John Baldwin wrote: > On Friday 10 February 2006 12:22, Joel Dahl wrote: > > On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 17:12 +0000, Ceri Davies wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 06:08:05PM +0100, Joel Dahl wrote: > > > > On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 18:41 +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > > > > > On 2006-02-10 17:34, Joel Dahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 15:12 +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > > > > > >> Index: > > > > > >> en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/contributors/contrib.develalumni.sgml > > > > > >> [...] > > > > > >> + <listitem> > > > > > >> + <para>&a.cokane; (2000 - 2002)</para><!-- Unclassified > > > > > >> commit bit --> + </listitem> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> If this is Coleman Kane, then by a magnificent stroke of luck, I > > > > > >> just received an email message from him yesterday, so we have his > > > > > >> address and he can reply for himself what his commit bit was > > > > > >> about. Let me know if that's useful. > > > > > > > > > > > > I believe you should talk to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Perhaps someone is > > > > > > interested > > > > > > in the access.unclassified file... > > > > > > > > > > Will do. Thanks :) > > > > > > > > > > >> [...] > > > > > >> <listitem> > > > > > >> + <para>&a.asami; (1993 - 2001)</para><!-- Unclassified > > > > > >> commit bit --> + </listitem> > > > > > >> + > > > > > >> > > > > > >> FYI, > > > > > >> asami-san (Satoshi Asami) was our Ports-meister for a long time. > > > > > > > > > > > > I know. What's your point? :-) > > > > > > > > > > I was curious why it was listed as `unclassified'. > > > > > > > > Ah, he is listed in CVSROOT-src/access.unclassified, which means his > > > > commit bit is unclassified. :-) > > > > > > No, that just means that he didn't move his entry to CVSROOT-foo/access > > > when the repo was split. > > > > Yes, and his commit bit is unclassified as a result of that... > > > > # $FreeBSD: CVSROOT-src/access.unclassified,v 1.645 2004/07/15 08:45:05 > > murray Exp $ > > # > > # This is a list of people who have unclassified commit bits who failed > > # to select their new home on the other access lists. > > # Any active committer may move folks from here to the correct lists > > # if requested. > > You can use common sense though. He was obviously a ports committer.
Guys, I'm lost. What are we arguing about? He was a ports committer, but I fail to see how that is important since the Development Team Alumni doesn't differentiate between different types of commit bits? Maybe I was a bit unclear with the meaning of the "unclassified commit bit" comment; it's just a reminder, since they're still in our access files. :-) -- Joel - joel at FreeBSD dot org _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
