On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 14:59:52 +0300 Boris Samorodov <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 14:49:49 +0300 Boris Samorodov wrote: > > On Mon, 7 Dec 2009 13:11:59 +0200 (EET) [email protected] wrote: > > > > ====================<phase 3: make patch>==================== > > > add_pkg > > > ===> Patching for gdm-2.28.1_3 > > > ===> Applying FreeBSD patches for gdm-2.28.1_3 > > > 2 out of 2 hunks failed--saving rejects to > > > daemon/gdm-session-direct.c.rej => Patch > > > patch-daemon_gdm-session-direct.c failed to apply cleanly. => > > > Patch(es) patch-common_Makefile.in patch-common_gdm-address.c > > > patch-common_gdm-address.h patch-common_gdm-common.c > > > patch-config.h.in patch-configure > > > patch-daemon-gdm-xdmcp-display-factory.c patch-daemon_Makefile.in > > > applied cleanly. *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop in /a/ports/x11/gdm. > > > ================================================================ > > > This seems to be fixed (but without PORTREVISION bump though). > > Hm, I actually ment that usually QAT's reaction is very quick. > At that case it wasn't. And I'm not sure if it will process > next commits or not. I know that the PORTREVISION should not > be bumped here. > It's just finished now, and it's OK. The slow reaction lately was because it's been off-line for a few days, and then it had to process qt4, kde4, gnome plus the back-log from the off-line period. I actually removed from the queue some of the ports touched in the last days. I'm moving it to a better machine, so this won;t be an issue in the future. -- IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect" FreeBSD committer -> [email protected], PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
