Isn't this bass-ackwards? Is there some functionality from unzip that
this port needs that the version now in the base does not provide? If
that's the case, can someone make that issue known so that interested
parties can address it?

*scratching head*

Doug


Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> marcus      2010-01-02 22:11:22 UTC
> 
>   FreeBSD ports repository
> 
>   Modified files:
>     archivers/file-roller Makefile 
>   Added files:
>     archivers/file-roller/files patch-src_fr-command-zip.c 
>   Log:
>   Now that -CURRENT has /usr/bin/unzip, explicitly invoke (and depend on)
>   archivers/unzip.
>   
>   Revision  Changes    Path
>   1.86      +6 -3      ports/archivers/file-roller/Makefile
>   1.1       +39 -0     
> ports/archivers/file-roller/files/patch-src_fr-command-zip.c (new)
> 
> http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/archivers/file-roller/Makefile.diff?&r1=1.85&r2=1.86&f=h
> http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/archivers/file-roller/files/patch-src_fr-command-zip.c
> 


-- 

        Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with
        a domain name makeover!    http://SupersetSolutions.com/

        Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
                        -- Pablo Picasso

_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"

Reply via email to