On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 18:34:39 -0500
Mark Linimon <[email protected]> mentioned:

> On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 06:39:51PM +0545, Gabor Kovesdan wrote:
> > It would be nice to receive a failure notification about such things. I  
> > didn't get anything neither for this one nor for the previous one. These  
> > notifications worked before and there were no commits like this without  
> > notifying the maintainer.
> 
> I guess I've erred on the side of not notifying people about breakages on
> systems that we don't have tinderboxen for, just to avoid filling up
> people's mailboxes.  What do other people think?  Am I making a mistake?
> 
> (Yes, in a perfect world we have tinderboxen for these ...)
> 

I think it's right thing to do for now.  Most people don't have any resources
to fix/test these, and it's not a tier1 platform, so I don't think it make
much sense to bother people with these failures.

-- 
Stanislav Sedov
ST4096-RIPE

Attachment: pgpizku5peElt.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to