On 06/02/10 17:14, Dmitry Marakasov wrote: > To find darcs, user should search for darcs, period. >
Understood. > Probably, needs checking. Actually the other ports you've mentioned in > another mail (p5-Parde et al) should probably be fixed to. > Actually they were Python ports, and they really need a lot of fixing. I have just wanted to point out that your references will not help me, because they are contradicting (and danfe@ agreed). > I'll add that prefixes should be thought of as a mean to: > - resolve name conflicts between bindings to a single lib for many > languages. I.e. this: > My problem is not with cases similar to "curl". > The priority of the last one is what we are arguing on - and I believe > we should tolerate towards plain users - they are likely a wider > audience, and they have less knowledge, thus it will be harder for them > to find hs-darcs, than for developers to find [nonhs-]somehaskelllib. > I got the message, thus I tried to split darcs since it is a tool for developers and an end-user application. Cheers, :g _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
