For those keeping score at home, yes, I made mistakes in every single port I committed to last night, yay me.
More in the way of explanation than excuse, I was coming off a bout of minor illness, really wanted to get things cleared off my plate, and rushed it. The libtorrent/deluge issue was complicated by having numerous trees lying around in various states of debugification because I was working with the libtorrent author to iron out some wrinkles in what was the release candidate for 0.15.1 so that I could commit the version update, the python bindings, and the new deluge port in one go. So, my apologies to anyone who was affected by the churn. I've double checked and I'm pretty sure I'm done now, so we can all breathe a sigh of relief. :-/ Doug On 07/01/10 12:27, Doug Barton wrote: > dougb 2010-07-01 19:27:18 UTC > > FreeBSD ports repository > > Modified files: > net-p2p/deluge Makefile > Log: > Bump PORTREVISION for rev 1.2 of the rc.d file > > ... because you can never have too many 1's in a PKGNAME > > Feature safe: yes > > Revision Changes Path > 1.69 +1 -0 ports/net-p2p/deluge/Makefile > > http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/net-p2p/deluge/Makefile.diff?&r1=1.68&r2=1.69&f=h > -- ... and that's just a little bit of history repeating. -- Propellerheads Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with a domain name makeover! http://SupersetSolutions.com/ _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
