On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 08:08:43PM +0800, Vanilla Hsu wrote: > xqilla 2.2.4 required xerces-c version 3.x, that's why i did not commit this > pr.
Which in turn raises these questions: - Why PR number was not referenced in the commit log? (148273) - Why didn't you (vanilla@) added the requirement for new xerces in audit log, and/or marked the PR as analyzed or pending feedback? - If 2.2.4 is totally broken with current xerces-c, how is that possible at all that this got committed? It suggests that no required run-time testing was done, if even build fails. Am I missing something, or things got really bad here? ./danfe > > 2010/7/16 Pietro Cerutti <[email protected]> > > > gahr 2010-07-16 10:14:11 UTC > > > > FreeBSD ports repository > > > > Modified files: > > textproc/xqilla Makefile distinfo > > Log: > > - Update to 2.2.4 > > > > Approved by: maintainer (timeout after 15 days) _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
