On 08/17/2010 07:36, Wesley Shields wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 02:24:16PM +0000, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
2010/8/17 Wesley Shields<[email protected]>:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 01:04:26PM +0000, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
bapt ? ? ? ?2010-08-17 13:04:26 UTC
? FreeBSD ports repository
? Modified files:
? ? . ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?MOVED
? ? security ? ? ? ? ? ? Makefile
? Removed files:
? ? security/isolate ? ? Makefile distinfo pkg-descr
? Log:
? Security vulnerability: local root privileges escalation problems
Wow, this seems a little excessive to me. Why was this removed? Is
upstream not going to fix the problem(s)? Isn't marking it broken and a
vuxml entry enough while we give them time to address the problems?
-- WXS
Sorry my log wasn't descriptive enough. Upstream asked me to remove
the ports, so did the maintainer.
Also upstream removed the google code page for the project and
currently doesn't plan a fix.
I'll try to make better commit log next time.
I was just curious because this seemed like a knee-jerk reaction on
our part. Turns out that it was directed by upstream and maintainer,
which is completely understandable. I was merely trying to make sure we
avoid knee-jerk reactions. Thank you for the clarification.
IMO a forced commit to indicate this is justified here.
--
Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with
a domain name makeover! http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
-- Pablo Picasso
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
