On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 3:53 AM, b. f. <[email protected]> wrote: > On 8/29/10, Chris Rees <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 29 August 2010 01:11, Rob Farmer <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 2:28 AM, Chris Rees <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> 2010/8/27 Alexey Dokuchaev <[email protected]>: >>>>> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 09:53:32PM -0700, Rob Farmer wrote: > >>>> Alternatively you could have it as another distfile in Scilab rather >>>> than depending on the port.... > > I think that would be the best short-term solution, since jgraphx does > not exist solely to be used for scilab. > > Rob, isn't scilab 2.3.0 coming out soon? It has been 4 weeks since > beta 2, and 8 weeks since beta 1. What versions of jgraphx will 2.3.0 > support? I think scilab git is now using jgraphx 1.4.0.2. Will this > problem disappear for a while with the new release? > > b. >
Probably not - Scilab 5.3.0 Betas (and probably the release) target 1.4.0.1, which is already several versions out of date. While the configure script says this is a minimum, I doubt much beyond that will run. As you can see in the this commit, even for minor point releases, jgraphx renames methods, changes what arguments they take, etc. so you pretty much have to target a precise version: http://bit.ly/a339Wh -- Rob Farmer _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
