Anonymous writes: > [email protected] (Ashish SHUKLA) writes: >> Anonymous writes: >>> Ashish SHUKLA <[email protected]> writes: >> >>>> ashish 2010-07-28 12:23:02 UTC >>>> >>>> FreeBSD ports repository >>>> >>>> Modified files: >>>> editors/emacs-devel Makefile distinfo pkg-plist >>>> editors/emacs-devel/files patch-Makefile.in >>>> Added files: >>>> editors/emacs-devel/files patch-configure >>>> Removed files: >>>> editors/emacs-devel/files patch-src-image.c >>> [...] >>>> +.if ${OSVERSION} > 900000 >>>> +PLIST_SUB+= 9X="" >>>> +.else >>>> +PLIST_SUB+= 9X="@comment " >>>> .endif >>> [...] >>>> +%%9X%%%%DATADIR%%/%%EMACS_VER%%/etc/DOC-%%EMACS_VER%%.2 >> >>> I don't have such a file on >> >>> $ uname -vm >>> FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #0 r210488=f584a68-dirty: Mon Jul 26 04:27:58 UTC 2010 >>> [email protected]:/a/objdir/a/dirty_build/sys/PHOENIX amd64 >> >>> I guess the transient file sometimes appear when you re-start broken >>> build rather than using `make clean && make all'. >> >> No it gets created during regular build. For details, check out the following >> build log on 9.0 (amd64): >> >> http://people.freebsd.org/~ashish/logs/emacs-24.0.50.100884%2c1.log
> FYI, pointyhat doesn't have that etc/DOC-24.0.50.2 file on 9-CURRENT. > And there are no packages for 9-CURRENT, neither for amd64 nor for i386. I'm surprised. I tried an update of emacs-devel with tinderbox and it resulted in same file being generated[1]. I guess I'll have to observe the build process more carefully before pushing the new update. If you've any insights about the problem, please let me know. References: [1] http://people.freebsd.org/~ashish/logs/emacs-24.0.50.101243%2c1.log Thanks -- Ashish SHUKLA | GPG: F682 CDCC 39DC 0FEA E116 20B6 C746 CFA9 E74F A4B0 freebsd.org!ashish | http://people.freebsd.org/~ashish/ Avoid Success At All Costs !!
pgp2ralOxu2L5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
