On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 04:45:45PM +0200, Remko Lodder wrote: > > On Sep 12, 2010, at 4:43 PM, Gabor PALI wrote: > > > On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 4:38 PM, Remko Lodder <[email protected]> wrote: > > Having translations in the first place makes people trigger, when I started > > the doc-nl project, there were translations in progress all the time and > > people got onboard because someone showed > > an example. > > > > All right, I accept. Then let me add another question: why the outdated > > translations are user-visible (i.e. compiled to HTML, PS, PDF, RTF) and > > possibly published on each release? >
BTW I dont understand why people are translating outdated docs... > Same answer. You honestly cannot judge about other translation teams > on their reasoning why things are and arent. The world aint perfect > and we should accept that. We can motivate people to some degree, and > then well something is better then nothing. > > But I feel you are pushing 'things'. So I suggest that you write > something that keeps our documentation automatically in sync, > translated. If that isn't possible for some reason then please let the > various groups decide what they can and cannot do. > I agree. If you annoy too much people, they'll stop spending their free time on the project. -- Marc _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
