Pawel Jakub Dawidek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 12:37:11AM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: > > > Hajimu UMEMOTO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > Log: > > > > NOMAN --> NO_MAN > > > No, the correct spelling is > > > MAN= > Since when? I found 36 NO_MAN='s in my tree and none 'MAN='.
Since we abandoned MAN[1-9]. The fact that many old Makefiles still use NO_MAN doesn't make it right; NO_MAN is a user knob, not a Makefile knob (same distinction as between WITH_FOO and USE_FOO in the ports tree). DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
