On Fri, 4 Mar 2011 16:37:25 +0800 wen heping wrote: > 2011/3/4 Boris Samorodov <[email protected]>: > > On Fri, 4 Mar 2011 02:15:10 +0000 (UTC) Wen Heping wrote: > > > >> wen 2011-03-04 02:15:10 UTC > > > >> FreeBSD ports repository > > > >> Modified files: > >> graphics/eog-plugins Makefile > >> graphics/shotwell Makefile > >> graphics/ethumb Makefile > >> multimedia/dvdstyler Makefile > >> multimedia/mlt Makefile > >> net/mediatomb Makefile > >> net/minidlna Makefile > >> sysutils/tracker-client Makefile > >> www/swiggle Makefile > >> x11-fm/gnome-commander2 Makefile > >> x11-fm/nautilus Makefile > >> x11-fm/thunar Makefile > >> x11-toolkits/nucleo Makefile > >> Log: > >> - Bump PORTREVISION to chase the update of libexif > > > > Was it necessary to bump those and other PORTREVISIONS? So > > far I was sure that PORTREVISION bumps are necessary as soon
> In porter's handbook: > Examples of when PORTREVISION should be bumped: > .... > Changes in the packing list or the install-time behavior of the > package (e.g. change to a script which generates initial data for the > package, like ssh host keys). > ..... > This update changed plist. I'm not sure if I got you right. Which plist(s) was(were) changed? > > as a shlib number changes. -- WBR, bsam _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
