On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 11:44:50AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > 2011/3/28 Wen Heping <[email protected]>: > > wen 2011-03-28 03:01:32 UTC > > > > Modified files: > > audio/kaudiocreator Makefile > > audio/libmusicbrainz3 Makefile > > audio/p5-MusicBrainz-DiscID Makefile > > audio/picard Makefile > > audio/py-musicbrainz2 Makefile > > audio/xmms2 Makefile > > Log: > > - Bump PORTREVISION to chase the update of audio/libdiscid > > > > PR: ports/155977 > > Submitted by: Jason E. Hale <[email protected]> > > > > Revision Changes Path > > 1.3 +1 -1 ports/audio/kaudiocreator/Makefile > > 1.46 +1 -0 ports/audio/libmusicbrainz3/Makefile > > 1.2 +2 -1 ports/audio/p5-MusicBrainz-DiscID/Makefile > > 1.27 +2 -3 ports/audio/picard/Makefile > > 1.11 +5 -1 ports/audio/py-musicbrainz2/Makefile > > 1.60 +2 -1 ports/audio/xmms2/Makefile > > > > There is a mistake in audio/py-musicbrainz2, which is broken now > (Missing license file for BSD in COPYING.txt), it should be > ${WRKSRC}/COPYING.txt for LICENSE_FILE.
Shouldn't we instead stop abusing LICENSE_FILE when it is just general FOO license text as defined by LICENSE=FOO? In the past we've tried to avoid spamming the users' filesystems with excessive copies of GPL; I was hoping that LICENSE framework would finally solve the problem once and for all; however, people continue to define LICENSE and LICENSE_FILE which usually points to verbatim license text thereof. :-( ./danfe _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
