On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 03:59:20PM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > Carefully selected and reasonable defaults is one of the strong sides > of ports (and thus packages) that we offer, despite all aforementioned > drawbacks.
User feedback at the last 2 conferences that I have been to, is that we are insufficiently consistent in our defaults. (In particular, X11 and CUPS are frequently mentioned as offenders; there are others.) This primarily affects our default-built packages. A post-BSDCan task for portmgr is to come up with recommendations on how to deal with this problem. mcl _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
