On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, Greg Larkin wrote: > I guess I can close PR 157396 now? Shall I assume that you'd still > like to remove Java support from the lang/gcc* ports, if possible?
I think you can close the PR, yes. As for removing Java support, I think having one instance of lang/gcc* with Java support should be sufficient, so now with lang/gcc46 featuring that, can we remove that from lang/gcc45? (That only means changing the USE_GCC line in pkdftk, I think? > Building pdftk with OpenJDK is the preferred solution. If that doesn't > work, I want to test if I can kick off a gcc+gcj build from the pdftk > port, use it to build a static pdftk, then clean everything up without > permanently installing gcc+gcj. Let me know if you think that will be > too messy. That sounds really heavy for users of pdftk, and I think we should have a version of lang/gcc that does not require that. BUT, that also could be a special version, a slave port with some special option set that the vast majority of users odes not need to worry about. Something for later, I guess; for now removing Java support from lang/gcc45 (and first adjusting pdftk) would be the next step I think? Gerald _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
