On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 08:25:57PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > On 08/22/2011 19:42, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 07:19:18PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > >> The version should only be specified for dependents that are tied to a > >> specific version. If the dependent can survive a version bump of the lib > >> then the dependency should be specified without version, and NOT bumped > >> when the lib is updated. > > > > I believe it will take too much work to verify which parts of the API port > > uses and either add or remove this suffix on every update. > > There are of course things that need to be consistent, but forcing > consistency where it's not necessary is not only not helpful, but can > cause more problems then it solves.
In general, yes, but in this particular case I don't see it causing any problems, being safe, "default" solution. ./danfe _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
